Daniel
5
The
Bible contains the accurate history of God’s involvement with mankind,
and the nation of Israel in particular. If you want to understand the Book
of Daniel you must catch hold of this history. Many commentators have
upheld this chapter (in particular) as being full of historical
inaccuracies and inconsistencies. Now, I have learned the lesson: if
you’re not sure what you are talking about … keep your mouth shut!
Because if these commentators had held their silence they would have found
that the evidence that was to come to light establishes the Biblical
account as being totally accurate. The lesson is: this Book – the Bible
– is God’s Holy, infallible, inerrant and inspired Word; it has no
inaccuracies, no error, no inconsistencies. To accuse it of such is to
deny its Authorship and to place it alongside the books of fictional
authors.
Before
we get right started there is something else that needs to be cleared up.
Some commentators go through the Book of Daniel and see things that God
never intended. For example, some take the four Hebrew words and make this
out of them:
Mene
“to number” (50 shekels)
Tekel
“to weigh” (1 shekel)
Upharsin
“to divide” (1/2 shekel) [Upharsin is the plural of Peres, v.28]
They
say: (v.25) Mene (1000), Mene (1000), Tekel (500), Upharsin (20) = 2,520.
They then began to work out all kinds of tremendous dates to tie in with
their formulae.
 |
604/603
BC: Babylon established as the dominant world Empire of the day
+ 2,520 years = 1917/1918 Downfall of the
Empires of the Babylonish Succession - Germany, Austria, Hungary,
Czarist Russia. General Allenby marched on Jerusalem and the land was
freed from its Turkish rule. |
 |
539
BC: Belshazzar - Supreme Pontiff of Babylon defiles the vessels of the
Jerusalem Temple. In one night his kingdom falls to the Medes and
Persians. + 2,520 years = Pope John Paul II - Supreme Pontiff of the
Babylonish Mystery Religion, is received in Britain, offers up the
idolatrous Mass publicly in the cities of regathered Israel, the
"appointed place" of 2 Samuel 7:10. He kissed the ground and
claimed the ground. |
I
simply mention these things to point out how careful we must be in
studying the Word of God and not to add to it out of our own fanciful
imaginations. Neither, on the other hand, should we be frightened to
tackle these passages for all scripture is … profitable for doctrine,
for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.
The
King’s Throne & The King’s Table
 |
It
was an interesting ‘set-up’ here in Babylon. Belshazzar was king
(v.1) … and he wasn’t king! |
 |
It
was one of those ‘strange’ situations. You do need to get an
understanding of the history to catch something of what was going on.
Here is the history: |
 |
Nebuchadnezzar
lived from 606-562 BC (44/5 years) |
 |
His
son, Evil-Merodach (“worshipper of Marduk”; chief god of Babylon,
equivalent to Baal), succeeded him and reigned for a period of 2 years
(562-560 BC). |
 |
However,
Evil-Merodach was murdered and overthrown by his brother-in-law
Neriglissar (559-556 BC). |
 |
Neriglissar
died and was succeeded by his young son, Labash-Marduk (556 BC), a
child king. |
 |
There
was a palace revolution and that child, Labash-Marduk, was beaten to
death by one of the army generals, Nabonidas, and he reigned from
556-539 B.C. (17 years). |
 |
During
these 17 years he strengthened his hold on the Babylonian throne by
marrying Nitokris, Nebuchadnezzar's daughter. |
 |
Nabonidas
and Nitokris had a son, Belshazzar. Since Nitokris was the daughter of
Nebuchadnezzar Belshazzar was the legal heir to the throne …
but, practically, he had to share it with Nabonidas, hence Dan. 5:7
And the king spake, and said to the wise men of Babylon, Whosoever
shall read this writing, and show me the interpretation thereof, shall
be clothed with scarlet, and have a chain of gold about his neck, and
shall be the third ruler in the kingdom. |
 |
So
this King Belshazzar was a ‘co-regent’ with King Nabonidas and it
was a kind of a ‘false rule’ because he was only sitting on the
throne ‘in the place of’ (anti)
Nabonidas. |
 |
He
was ruling in the stead of (anti)
another. Belshazzar was only the second authority in the Babylonian
empire; he was living and working and reigning in another man’s
stead, i.e. he was simply representative (anti)
of Nabonidus, - the supreme ruler of Babylon. |
 |
Babylon
stood for all that opposed God, - whether it was under the rule of
Nebuchadnezzar, Nabonidus or Belshazzar. |
 |
Such
was the evil influence and their opposition to God. |
 |
You
know, the spirit of Babylon has never ceased, … in fact, it has
grown. |
 |
Back
in the days of Belshazzar it covered a large area … but nothing in
comparison to what the new Babylon covers today. |
 |
That
Greek word (anti) can mean
“to be in opposition to” or it can equally mean “to be in place
of, to represent”. |
 |
Babylon
stands for everything that opposes God, - His authority, His Word, His
ways, His Holiness.
 |
It
not only stands “in opposition to”, but it also stands “in
place of” God. |
 |
Turn
to Mt. 2: 22 But when he heard that Archelaus did reign in
Judaea in the room of [anti]
his father Herod |
|
 |
Paul
warned the Thessalonians about the influence of the spirit of Babylon,
 |
II
Thess. 2: 3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that
day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and
that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4 Who
opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or
that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of
God, showing himself that he is God. |
|
 |
Where
did this spirit of Babylon begin? Is. 14: 12 How art thou fallen
from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to
the ground, which didst weaken the nations! 13 For thou hast
said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne
above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the
congregation, in the sides of the north: 14 I will ascend above
the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. |
 |
The
spirit of Babylon has Satan from hell as its source! |
 |
…
Back to Daniel 5. Belshazzar didn’t ravage the temple in Jerusalem,
- that had already been done, and the temple was lying in ruins. |
 |
And
how else did he manage to oppose God and take unto himself that
which was God’s? Simple … 2 Belshazzar, whiles he tasted the
wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which his
father Nebuchadnezzar had taken out of the temple which was in
Jerusalem; that the king, and his princes, his wives, and his
concubines, might drink therein. 3 Then they brought the golden
vessels that were taken out of the temple of the house of God which
was at Jerusalem; and the king, and his princes, his wives, and his
concubines, drank in them. |
 |
What
did he do? … and what did he encourage others to do? v.4 They drank
wine, and praised the gods of gold, and of silver, of brass, of iron,
of wood, and of stone.
 |
Those
items that Solomon had dedicated to the glory of God and were to
be used for no other purpose but in the worship of Jehovah
Belshazzar took them, used them for his own pleasure, and then
applied them in the worship of his pagan idols. i.e. he replaced [anti]
God. |
|
 |
Don’t
you see how we can apply that? The spirit of Babylon has never been
removed from this world. It has increased. It affects the lives of
every inhabitant upon the face of this earth.
 |
In
governments today the law of God has long been replaced (anti), |
 |
In
many churches today the holy God has been replaced (anti)
by the old pagan idolatry of human superstitions and human
aspirations, |
 |
In
society the Word of God is vilified, laughed at, has no relevance
and has been replaced (anti).
Horoscopes are consulted, reincarnation is believed, eastern
mysticism is so subtle that not even many Christians recognise it. |
|
 |
From
the throne of Babylon and from its table the spirit of
Babylon is very much in evidence today. |
The
King’s Trouble & Terror
 |
God
said, “Enough!” While all these powerful men and dignitaries were
mocking His Name and mocking the symbols taken from the House of God
in Jerusalem He stepped in where He wasn’t invited! |
 |
…
And when God spoke, the king shook. The party ended! The laughing
stopped. The mocking ceased! The golden and silver vessels from the
temple of Jerusalem, out of which they were drinking (vv.2,3) … they
were now sitting on the table. |
 |
That
evening in Babylon, the Lord came like a thief in the night … and
those people trembled!
 |
They
were no longer drinking their wine, |
 |
They
were no longer praising their gods. |
|
 |
…
because God Himself came uninvited into their presence! |
 |
Babylon
wasn’t expecting Him. As far as they were concerned, He was the God
of a foreign nation. God had nothing to do with Babylon! Babylon was
outside His jurisdiction! |
 |
…
But God was not outside His jurisdiction; King David wrote, Ps. 47:7
God is the King of all the earth … 8 God reigneth over the
heathen: God sitteth upon the throne of his holiness. |
 |
There
is a day coming when this same God, in the form of the Lord Jesus
Christ, will burst in upon this modern-day Babylon, Rev. 1:7
Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they
also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail
because of him. |
 |
And
that is what was happening around this table of the king’s in
Babylon. He saw the
finger writing the words:
… v.6
 |
His
face became all distorted with the fear that rushed through his
body, |
 |
His
conscience took a tremendous hold upon him, |
 |
The
bones of his body tightened, his knees knocked together. |
|
 |
This
man and those with him had come face-to-face with the holiness and the
awesome power of a terrible God. |
 |
This
king and those with him were in absolute terror at the coming of God
into their midst! |
 |
The
throne of the king, the table of the king, the king’s trouble and
the king’s terror.
On to the scene comes Daniel … |
He
didn’t share their company
 |
v.12
now let Daniel be called, and he will show the interpretation. 13
Then was Daniel brought in before the king. |
 |
It’s
important to notice this, - they had to call Daniel! Daniel
wasn’t among them.
 |
What
had he become? … the queen came in and told Belshazzar, v.11b
Nebuchadnezzar thy father, the king, I say, thy father, made master
of the magicians, astrologers, Chaldeans, and soothsayers …
and yet, Daniel wasn’t at this big feast … when undoubtedly he
could have been! |
|
 |
He
stayed away from their company. He didn’t want to share company with
Babylon … because Babylon stood in opposition to everything he
believed; Babylon stood in opposition to (anti)
God! |
 |
And
Daniel wouldn’t share company with them … and that is why he had
to be called in … because he wouldn’t sit with them as they drank
out of and mocked the vessels of the beloeved temple in Jerusalem, and
neither would he sit with them as they worshipped other gods. |
 |
You
see the lesson there, don’t you? The ‘table of Babylon’ is no
place for the child of God. |
 |
How
would Daniel have felt if he had been sitting there drinking out of
those cups with the enemies of God … enjoying himself … and the
finger beginning to write on the wall?! |
 |
Babylon
is a reality today! The spirit of Babylon is increased. The Bible
says, Rev. 17:14 These [Babylon and her allies] shall make war
with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of
lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and
chosen, and faithful. |
 |
Daniel
didn’t share their company. … and … |
He
didn’t seek their treasure
 |
v.
17 Then Daniel answered and said before the king, Let thy gifts be to
thyself, and give thy rewards to another |
 |
“I’ll
give you all this if you can tell me what the writing on the wall
means”, said the king. |
 |
“I
don’t want it. I don’t want to live off the proceeds of the
enemies of God. I’m not looking for your treasure.” said Daniel |
 |
Daniel
was looking for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker
is God (Heb. 11:10). … not Babylon! |
 |
He
was relying on the promises God spoke through His prophets, - the
promises he believed in that would bring him back to Jerusalem again.
Babylon was not his final home! |
 |
That’s
why Daniel didn’t share their company or seek their
treasure.
One final
thought … |
He
didn’t shirk his responsibility
 |
v.23b
the God in whose hand thy breath is, and whose are all thy ways, hast
thou not glorified |
 |
He
didn’t sit at the table of Babylon, he didn’t seek their treasure,
and he didn’t shirk his responsibility. |
 |
Who
was his first responsibility to? To Belshazzar? No! To the people of
Babylon? No! To the captive people of Israel? No! |
 |
Who
was his first responsibility to then? … God.
 |
God
had brought him to Babylon. |
 |
God
had taken him into the court of the king. |
 |
God
had given him the ability to interpret dreams. |
|
 |
His
first responsibility was to God! |
 |
…
And he didn’t water down God’s Word. He didn’t smooth the rough
edges. He didn’t ‘flavour it to the king’s palate’. |
 |
He
gave it as he received it from God. |
 |
When
God lays a passage of Scripture and a message on your heart you
daren’t do anything else but preach it as He gives it! |
 |
I
don’t write the message … I’m only the messenger! |
 |
You
imagine Daniel standing up in front of those 1000 (v.1) dignitaries,
politicians, influential people … and yet he gave them God’s Word
… nothing else! |
 |
He
didn’t shirk his responsibility. |
Conclusion
 |
Even
before Daniel faced the den of lions (ch.6) he faced the ‘thousand
lords’. |
 |
Isn’t
it a lesson to learn from this prophet of God who by now, - like John
on the island of Patmos, - was an old man! |
 |
He
stood faithfully before the king’s throne, |
 |
When
many another one half his age would have ran away he stood, - he
didn’t sit at the king’s table!, - he didn’t share
their company or seek their treasure. |
 |
He
recognised the king’s trouble and the king’s terror
but he spoke the word of God nevertheless, - Daniel didn’t shirk
his responsibility. |
 |
May
the Lord teach us through His Word this evening to stand even as
Daniel stood! |
|